Masterbation Ways For Men

DEFENCE WITH INCIDENTAL

ECC.MA SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL WITH DEFENCE CASSAZIONE
INCIDENTAL
interests of Delta SpA (hereinafter, briefly, "Delta"), established in ... ... on ... ... ... ... CF and PI, in the person of ... ..., represented and, by virtue of the special prosecutor in the end of this act, by. ... ... The Court of Rome, and elected domicile at his studio in Rome, on ... ...
- resistant and recurrent incidentally -
AGAINST
Beta SpA (hereinafter, briefly, "Beta"), represented by its legal representative pro tempore, represented and Avv. ... ... And address for service at his studio in Rome, on ... ...
- sought -
in the proceedings brought with Delta to appeal served on ../../ ...., For the annulment of the sentence no Of ... ... ... ... Court of Appeals, dated ../../ ...., Filed on ../../ ...., Notified on ../../ .... .

I. - Done and moving the process
1 .- By a summons dated ../../ .... Beta Delta sued in the Court of ... ... made the following questions ... .... In support of these applications Beta has concluded that ... ...
With its response on ../../ .... Delta has been in court, and objected at the outset the action was time-barred by collateral held by Beta, pursuant to art. 1495 cc and in substance to rebut the claims and demands of the actress, asking the full rejection. Delta also reduced by the failure of Beta obligation under the contract between the parties, to purchase a minimum quantity of goods, in a counterclaim asking the question of that breach of contract and damages. At the hearing on
../../ ...., The judge assigned to the parties the terms of art. 183, comma 6, c.p.c., a seguito del quale Beta ha depositato la prima memoria in data ../../…. con la quale ha contestato il dedotto inadempimento contrattuale sostenendo che il contratto non prevedeva alcun impegno quale quello indicato da Delta e comunque invocando il disposto dell’art. 1460 c.c.; Beta ha inoltre formulato istanza per l’ammissione di consulenza tecnica diretta a individuare le cause del sinistro e la quantificazione dei danni, e ha assunto le seguenti conclusioni …… .
Nelle proprie memorie ex art. 183, comma 6, c.p.c. Delta ha insistito nelle eccezioni e domande svolte con la comparsa di risposta e chiesto il rigetto delle istanze istruttorie di Beta.
Con ordinanza in data ../../…., il Court dismissed the requests of Beta inquiry and invited the parties to clarify the findings, setting a hearing for ../../ .... . At that hearing
Beta said the findings proposing those taken with the memory art. 183, paragraph 6, No 1, cpc on ../../ ...., Delta said the findings by reference to those contained in the response and subsequent pleadings, so as follows ... ...
With No Judgement Of ../../ ... ... ...., Filed on ../../ ...., The Court of ... ..., in upholding the preliminary objection of limitation raised by Delta has rejected the applications of Beta. The Court also rejected Delta's counterclaims, finding that ... ..., and has offset the cost in the region of partial mutual loses.
2 .- An appeal against the said decision of the Court of ... ..., Beta appealed, with a summons on ../../ ...., Asking the Court of Appeals ... ....
With its response on ../../ .... . Delta was founded in appeal proceedings demanding the dismissal of the adversary and suggesting in turn appeal incidentally, made the following conclusions ... ....
The Court, by order made at the hearing, referred the case to the hearing on ../../ .... for clarification of the conclusions, in which the parties have relied on the pleadings in the above questions, and the Court has held the cause in the decision.
With No Judgement ... ... ... Issued on ../../. and filed on ../../ ...., the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by Beta in the main street and the appeal of cross-Delta, confirming the decision at first instance and in holding as follows ... .... 3 .- With
appeal served on a Delta ../../ ...., Beta has appealed to the Supreme Court against the aforementioned decision n. Of ... ... ... ... Court of Appeals, arguing the following means:
- "violation and misapplication of Article. 2395 cc in relation to the plea in the first paragraph, no 3, art. Cpc 360 "by this means, the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals failed to apply the provisions on prescription and in particular the provision of Article. 2935 cc, as stated in the action required to secure the course of one year from the delivery of movable property, provided by Delta, without considering that Beta could not assert his right, before the expiry of that period, not being at that date carried out the checks necessary to identify the cause of the accident, therefore, the applicant, the Court erred in finding the required action, as it applied the provisions of art. 2935 cc
- "violation and misapplication of Article. 2943 cc in relation to the plea of \u200b\u200bArticle. 360, paragraph 1, no 3 Code of Civil Procedure "and" omitted and, however, insufficient grounds for the decision made about a controversial and crucial to the proceedings (Article 360, paragraph 1, No. 5, CCP), in relation to failure to take account of an event which interrupts the prescription " : by this means, the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals would rule out the effect of interrupting the limitation period of the letter dated ../../ .... in violation of Article. 2943 cc and with insufficient justification given the findings Document;
- "violation of Article. 112 in relation to the plea in the first paragraph, no 3, art. Code and 360, however, insufficient and contradictory reasons for the decision made about a controversial and crucial to the proceedings (Article 360, first paragraph, No. 5, CCP), in relation to the ruling on the question of damages for breach requirement of customer service provided by the contract "means the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals ... ... failed to rule on any of the questions proposed by the applicant, in violation of Article. 112 Code, and in particular on the question of damages resulting from the Delta's obligation, which was stipulated in the contract between the parties of ongoing assistance to end users of Beta. According to the applicant, the Court of Appeals failed to rule on the specific and independent ground of appeal on the point raised by Beta, which had criticized the decision at first instance in which the Court of ... ... had rejected this demand, as the Court limited a general confirmation of the decision at first instance without any reasoning on this point.

II .- Law and the counter-action opponent.
1 .- The first half of the applicant's main appeal:
With reference to the first ground of appeal, he alleges, first eligible, to Article. 360 bis, n. 1, cpc
The applicant alleged a violation of Article. 2935 cc As is known, the inability to enforce the law, to which art. 2935 cc attaches importance to the fact of the preventative effect of the requirement is only that which comes from legal causes which hinder the exercise of that right and does not cover the impediments or obstacles of a purely subjective fact, as those who find their cause ignorance, by the owner, the event generator and the delay of his right which he proceeds to check (see Cass. ... ...). In this case the circumstances cited by the applicant are represented by mere impediments vice versa of fact. Indeed, Beta has invoked the following circumstances ... ....
The sentence appeal is therefore in conformity with the provision alleged to infringe and guidelines established Ecc.ma Of this Court regarding the interpretation and application of that rule, guidelines with respect to which the appeal opponent does not offer evidence that would justify a different interpretation terms and the assumption made by the applicant.
For the same considerations, the sentence must be considered beyond reproach and its means of action as unfounded.
2 .- The second half of the main appeal of the applicant: The applicant
criticized the ruling of the Court of Appeal has ruled that effective interrupting the limitation period under Art. 2943 cc to the letter of ../../ .... Contributed by Beta Delta. The applicant claimed that ... ... (Recv. Chambers., P.. ... ...). The vessel was raised both in terms of violation of rules of law, both in terms of lack of reasoning in order to a decisive event of the dispute.
The first half is unacceptable under Article. 360 bis, n. 1, cpc The ruling of the Court of Appeals ... ... contested fact has rejected the appeal and upheld the ruling of Beta of First Instance had ruled that the letter of the effectiveness of interrupting ../../ .... complying with the legal issue of consolidated guidance Of this Ecc.ma Court about the requirements of the act of formal capable of interrupting the limitation period under Art. 2943 cc
The decision under appeal, to justify its decision, has found that ... ..., and then repeatedly accordance with the policy expressed by the Supreme Court to the effect that ... ....
addition, the applicant did not specify the reasons why in this case suggests that it should be changed.
The medium is also unacceptable in regard to the reconstruction of relations between the parties made by the trial court and removed from discretionary assessment of review. Under the guidance of consolidated
MISUSE Ecc.ma Court, that an act may become enforceable interrupting the limitation period, in accordance with art. 2943, paragraph 4, Civil Code, it must also include an explanation of a claim, ie a notice or a written request for compliance, such as to express the unequivocal will of the owner of the claim to assert his right against the party passive, with the effect of formal notice. The finding of objective requirement (not apparent in the simple stress-free nature of intimacy and expressed formal request to debtor) is in fact reserved for the appreciation of the investigative judge of the merits, not in the questionable legality if immune logical defects and suitably substantiated. In this case, the Court of Appeals has stated the reasons why it considered inappropriate to the Act for the purpose of interrupting prescription, noting that ... ....
The rationale has been criticized in conjunction with Article. 360, paragraph 1, no 5, Code of Civil Procedure for failure to state reasons.
In this case, the letter of ../../ .... merely to recognize that reserving ... ... ... .... As correctly noted by the Court of Appeals, then the letter contained a reservation of all generic and as such unfit to be a manifestation of intention to rely on the warranty. The ruling then made the correct application of the rules cited by the applicant and is about to immune defects in logical reasoning, fully consistent and compliant with the underlying documentation.
3 .- The third remedy
By this means Beta alleged a violation of Article. 112 Code of Civil Procedure arguing that the Court of Appeals ... ... failed to rule on an applicant's request and on a specific ground of appeal. Censorship is proposed is a violation of Article. 112 CCP art. 360, paragraph 1, no 3, is omitted or insufficient justification for art. 360, paragraph 1, no 5, cpc
The reason is unacceptable. According to the guideline established Ecc.ma Of this Court, the decision of the appellate court can not examine and decides a ground for complaint of the ruling of the court of first instance may be appealed to the Supreme Court not for a lack, or insufficient motivation on a decisive issue in the dispute and not for reasons given in a way but other than that allowed for failure ruling on a ground of appeal. It follows, then, that if the defect is terminated pursuant to art. 360, No 3 or No 5, instead of CCP art. 360, No 4, Civil Code in relation to Article. 112 Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal is inadmissible.
The complaint is unfounded, however, because the rejection of this application also can be deduced from the attacking device that has fully confirmed the decision at first instance and reasons can be deduced from the implicit grounds of the appeal, that appear to be inconsistent with the rulings requested by the applicant.
As is clear from the Court of Appeal ... ....

III .- Right: the grounds for appeal.
1. Violation and misapplication of Articles. 1362 and 1363 cc in relation to the reason mentioned in paragraph 3 of the first paragraph of art. 360 cpc
The Court of Appeal dismissed the cross appeal brought by Delta, with which the member had alleged that the ruling of first instance had dismissed the application for a declaration of breach of contract of Beta and termination of contract the fault of the same beta. With the appearance on appeal on ../../ .... Delta has revived these questions, asking the Court of Appeals ... ....
On this point the Court of Appeals gave the following reasons ... ... ... ... its decision.
Delta believes that the decision under appeal is about to commit an error of law, where the Court held that under the agreements between the parties had not provided any obligation to purchase minimum quantities of Beta. The Court of Appeal has in fact considered only the wording of the clause in art. ... ... ... ../../ Of the contract. which provided sales targets, regardless of the systematic plan and set to further follow-up communications between the parties, which were established in the following consequences in case of failure to achieve goals: a letter from Delta ../../ ...., in which it was stated that ... ... and the next letter Beta of ../../ .... where Beta took note of the contents of the previous letter Delta: communications should be considered supplementary to the contract and related provisions (see doc. ... ... products from Delta with the response of first instance).
The Court of Appeals failed to apply the rules laid down in Articles. 1362, subsection 2, 1363 cc and under which, in the identification of the will of the parties must proceed systematic recourse to the criterion and the coordination of the various contract terms, and the search for the will of the parties taking into account the overall conduct of the parties. The Court of MISUSE Ecc.ma Court, albeit in a non-unanimous, held that the criterion of literal interpretation of the will of the parties claimed art. 1362, cc, paragraph 1, is not placed on a level of supremacy from the criterion represented by the conduct of the parties even after the conclusion of the contract mentioned in paragraph 2 of Rule.
The Court of Appeal erred in finding that first case in the wording of the contract was not likely to give rise to doubts being however, the maxim in claris non fit interpretatio questionable expression of a principle, not the subject of a clear authority, having taken into account in the process of interpretation, even in the face of a given literal may look clear, the conduct of the parties after the conclusion of the contract which prove to be capable of clarifying and determining the will of the parties. In this case, there were acts of the trial documents, and the first letters of ../../ .... and ../../ .... . These letters were referred to the contractual provision containing an indication of revenue targets, and they could not be regarded as supplementary to the contract.
The Court of Appeals failed to consider and excluding any relevance of subsequent conduct of the parties and especially the many letters in which Beta was referring to the objectives stated that ... .... It is precisely the point of ../../ .... where it is said that ... ... and the letter of ../../ .... where it was also stated that ... .... In this way, the Court of Appeals disregarded the art. 1362, subsection 2, Code of Civil Procedure In
not consider the conduct of the parties following the conclusion of the contract and the statements referred to in letters exchanged between the parties, the Court has also violated Article. 1363 cc under which the contract provisions are interpreted by each other, so direct examination was negotiating to rebuild will be global.
The Court of Appeals ... ... then disregarded the rules that the parties' intention to seek even more according to standards that may accompany the literal data.

For all those reasons, Delta SpA, represented and as specified in the epigraph,
ASKS
this Ecc.ma Supreme Court or tribunal should:
- dismiss the action brought by Beta and Delta notified on. ./../ .... against sentence no ... ... Given by the Court of Appeals on ../../ ... ... ...., Lodged with the Registrar on ../../ ...., for all the reasons for rejection are unfounded and explained in this document;
- in allowing the appeal in the alternative proposed by Delta, set aside the sentence no ... ... Given by the Court of Appeals on ../../ ... ... ...., Lodged with the Registrar on ../../ .... limited to the chief who has rejected requests for a finding of Beta obligations to purchase minimum quantities of products under contract ... ../../. to issue and under the terms mentioned in this document, and the subsequent application for an order to pay damages;
- in strict subordination, relative to the appeal, MISUSE Ecc.ma Court if it considers unnecessary additional findings of fact, deciding the merits pursuant to art. 384 cpc, accept the above claims made by Delta, which are rewritten here with the Act's definition of the Opinion filed on ../../ .... On appeal:
... ... ... ...

- order Beta SpA recast costs and fees of this proceeding.
With the original of this defense, the copy shall be deposited notified of the action of Beta, and the file of the two previous instances.
Rome, Mr. ... ... ... ...

Special Prosecution:

Masterbation Ways For Men

DEFENCE WITH INCIDENTAL

ECC.MA SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL WITH DEFENCE CASSAZIONE
INCIDENTAL
interests of Delta SpA (hereinafter, briefly, "Delta"), established in ... ... on ... ... ... ... CF and PI, in the person of ... ..., represented and, by virtue of the special prosecutor in the end of this act, by. ... ... The Court of Rome, and elected domicile at his studio in Rome, on ... ...
- resistant and recurrent incidentally -
AGAINST
Beta SpA (hereinafter, briefly, "Beta"), represented by its legal representative pro tempore, represented and Avv. ... ... And address for service at his studio in Rome, on ... ...
- sought -
in the proceedings brought with Delta to appeal served on ../../ ...., For the annulment of the sentence no Of ... ... ... ... Court of Appeals, dated ../../ ...., Filed on ../../ ...., Notified on ../../ .... .

I. - Done and moving the process
1 .- By a summons dated ../../ .... Beta Delta sued in the Court of ... ... made the following questions ... .... In support of these applications Beta has concluded that ... ...
With its response on ../../ .... Delta has been in court, and objected at the outset the action was time-barred by collateral held by Beta, pursuant to art. 1495 cc and in substance to rebut the claims and demands of the actress, asking the full rejection. Delta also reduced by the failure of Beta obligation under the contract between the parties, to purchase a minimum quantity of goods, in a counterclaim asking the question of that breach of contract and damages. At the hearing on
../../ ...., The judge assigned to the parties the terms of art. 183, comma 6, c.p.c., a seguito del quale Beta ha depositato la prima memoria in data ../../…. con la quale ha contestato il dedotto inadempimento contrattuale sostenendo che il contratto non prevedeva alcun impegno quale quello indicato da Delta e comunque invocando il disposto dell’art. 1460 c.c.; Beta ha inoltre formulato istanza per l’ammissione di consulenza tecnica diretta a individuare le cause del sinistro e la quantificazione dei danni, e ha assunto le seguenti conclusioni …… .
Nelle proprie memorie ex art. 183, comma 6, c.p.c. Delta ha insistito nelle eccezioni e domande svolte con la comparsa di risposta e chiesto il rigetto delle istanze istruttorie di Beta.
Con ordinanza in data ../../…., il Court dismissed the requests of Beta inquiry and invited the parties to clarify the findings, setting a hearing for ../../ .... . At that hearing
Beta said the findings proposing those taken with the memory art. 183, paragraph 6, No 1, cpc on ../../ ...., Delta said the findings by reference to those contained in the response and subsequent pleadings, so as follows ... ...
With No Judgement Of ../../ ... ... ...., Filed on ../../ ...., The Court of ... ..., in upholding the preliminary objection of limitation raised by Delta has rejected the applications of Beta. The Court also rejected Delta's counterclaims, finding that ... ..., and has offset the cost in the region of partial mutual loses.
2 .- An appeal against the said decision of the Court of ... ..., Beta appealed, with a summons on ../../ ...., Asking the Court of Appeals ... ....
With its response on ../../ .... . Delta was founded in appeal proceedings demanding the dismissal of the adversary and suggesting in turn appeal incidentally, made the following conclusions ... ....
The Court, by order made at the hearing, referred the case to the hearing on ../../ .... for clarification of the conclusions, in which the parties have relied on the pleadings in the above questions, and the Court has held the cause in the decision.
With No Judgement ... ... ... Issued on ../../. and filed on ../../ ...., the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by Beta in the main street and the appeal of cross-Delta, confirming the decision at first instance and in holding as follows ... .... 3 .- With
appeal served on a Delta ../../ ...., Beta has appealed to the Supreme Court against the aforementioned decision n. Of ... ... ... ... Court of Appeals, arguing the following means:
- "violation and misapplication of Article. 2395 cc in relation to the plea in the first paragraph, no 3, art. Cpc 360 "by this means, the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals failed to apply the provisions on prescription and in particular the provision of Article. 2935 cc, as stated in the action required to secure the course of one year from the delivery of movable property, provided by Delta, without considering that Beta could not assert his right, before the expiry of that period, not being at that date carried out the checks necessary to identify the cause of the accident, therefore, the applicant, the Court erred in finding the required action, as it applied the provisions of art. 2935 cc
- "violation and misapplication of Article. 2943 cc in relation to the plea of \u200b\u200bArticle. 360, paragraph 1, no 3 Code of Civil Procedure "and" omitted and, however, insufficient grounds for the decision made about a controversial and crucial to the proceedings (Article 360, paragraph 1, No. 5, CCP), in relation to failure to take account of an event which interrupts the prescription " : by this means, the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals would rule out the effect of interrupting the limitation period of the letter dated ../../ .... in violation of Article. 2943 cc and with insufficient justification given the findings Document;
- "violation of Article. 112 in relation to the plea in the first paragraph, no 3, art. Code and 360, however, insufficient and contradictory reasons for the decision made about a controversial and crucial to the proceedings (Article 360, first paragraph, No. 5, CCP), in relation to the ruling on the question of damages for breach requirement of customer service provided by the contract "means the applicant complained that the Court of Appeals ... ... failed to rule on any of the questions proposed by the applicant, in violation of Article. 112 Code, and in particular on the question of damages resulting from the Delta's obligation, which was stipulated in the contract between the parties of ongoing assistance to end users of Beta. According to the applicant, the Court of Appeals failed to rule on the specific and independent ground of appeal on the point raised by Beta, which had criticized the decision at first instance in which the Court of ... ... had rejected this demand, as the Court limited a general confirmation of the decision at first instance without any reasoning on this point.

II .- Law and the counter-action opponent.
1 .- The first half of the applicant's main appeal:
With reference to the first ground of appeal, he alleges, first eligible, to Article. 360 bis, n. 1, cpc
The applicant alleged a violation of Article. 2935 cc As is known, the inability to enforce the law, to which art. 2935 cc attaches importance to the fact of the preventative effect of the requirement is only that which comes from legal causes which hinder the exercise of that right and does not cover the impediments or obstacles of a purely subjective fact, as those who find their cause ignorance, by the owner, the event generator and the delay of his right which he proceeds to check (see Cass. ... ...). In this case the circumstances cited by the applicant are represented by mere impediments vice versa of fact. Indeed, Beta has invoked the following circumstances ... ....
The sentence appeal is therefore in conformity with the provision alleged to infringe and guidelines established Ecc.ma Of this Court regarding the interpretation and application of that rule, guidelines with respect to which the appeal opponent does not offer evidence that would justify a different interpretation terms and the assumption made by the applicant.
For the same considerations, the sentence must be considered beyond reproach and its means of action as unfounded.
2 .- The second half of the main appeal of the applicant: The applicant
criticized the ruling of the Court of Appeal has ruled that effective interrupting the limitation period under Art. 2943 cc to the letter of ../../ .... Contributed by Beta Delta. The applicant claimed that ... ... (Recv. Chambers., P.. ... ...). The vessel was raised both in terms of violation of rules of law, both in terms of lack of reasoning in order to a decisive event of the dispute.
The first half is unacceptable under Article. 360 bis, n. 1, cpc The ruling of the Court of Appeals ... ... contested fact has rejected the appeal and upheld the ruling of Beta of First Instance had ruled that the letter of the effectiveness of interrupting ../../ .... complying with the legal issue of consolidated guidance Of this Ecc.ma Court about the requirements of the act of formal capable of interrupting the limitation period under Art. 2943 cc
The decision under appeal, to justify its decision, has found that ... ..., and then repeatedly accordance with the policy expressed by the Supreme Court to the effect that ... ....
addition, the applicant did not specify the reasons why in this case suggests that it should be changed.
The medium is also unacceptable in regard to the reconstruction of relations between the parties made by the trial court and removed from discretionary assessment of review. Under the guidance of consolidated
MISUSE Ecc.ma Court, that an act may become enforceable interrupting the limitation period, in accordance with art. 2943, paragraph 4, Civil Code, it must also include an explanation of a claim, ie a notice or a written request for compliance, such as to express the unequivocal will of the owner of the claim to assert his right against the party passive, with the effect of formal notice. The finding of objective requirement (not apparent in the simple stress-free nature of intimacy and expressed formal request to debtor) is in fact reserved for the appreciation of the investigative judge of the merits, not in the questionable legality if immune logical defects and suitably substantiated. In this case, the Court of Appeals has stated the reasons why it considered inappropriate to the Act for the purpose of interrupting prescription, noting that ... ....
The rationale has been criticized in conjunction with Article. 360, paragraph 1, no 5, Code of Civil Procedure for failure to state reasons.
In this case, the letter of ../../ .... merely to recognize that reserving ... ... ... .... As correctly noted by the Court of Appeals, then the letter contained a reservation of all generic and as such unfit to be a manifestation of intention to rely on the warranty. The ruling then made the correct application of the rules cited by the applicant and is about to immune defects in logical reasoning, fully consistent and compliant with the underlying documentation.
3 .- The third remedy
By this means Beta alleged a violation of Article. 112 Code of Civil Procedure arguing that the Court of Appeals ... ... failed to rule on an applicant's request and on a specific ground of appeal. Censorship is proposed is a violation of Article. 112 CCP art. 360, paragraph 1, no 3, is omitted or insufficient justification for art. 360, paragraph 1, no 5, cpc
The reason is unacceptable. According to the guideline established Ecc.ma Of this Court, the decision of the appellate court can not examine and decides a ground for complaint of the ruling of the court of first instance may be appealed to the Supreme Court not for a lack, or insufficient motivation on a decisive issue in the dispute and not for reasons given in a way but other than that allowed for failure ruling on a ground of appeal. It follows, then, that if the defect is terminated pursuant to art. 360, No 3 or No 5, instead of CCP art. 360, No 4, Civil Code in relation to Article. 112 Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal is inadmissible.
The complaint is unfounded, however, because the rejection of this application also can be deduced from the attacking device that has fully confirmed the decision at first instance and reasons can be deduced from the implicit grounds of the appeal, that appear to be inconsistent with the rulings requested by the applicant.
As is clear from the Court of Appeal ... ....

III .- Right: the grounds for appeal.
1. Violation and misapplication of Articles. 1362 and 1363 cc in relation to the reason mentioned in paragraph 3 of the first paragraph of art. 360 cpc
The Court of Appeal dismissed the cross appeal brought by Delta, with which the member had alleged that the ruling of first instance had dismissed the application for a declaration of breach of contract of Beta and termination of contract the fault of the same beta. With the appearance on appeal on ../../ .... Delta has revived these questions, asking the Court of Appeals ... ....
On this point the Court of Appeals gave the following reasons ... ... ... ... its decision.
Delta believes that the decision under appeal is about to commit an error of law, where the Court held that under the agreements between the parties had not provided any obligation to purchase minimum quantities of Beta. The Court of Appeal has in fact considered only the wording of the clause in art. ... ... ... ../../ Of the contract. which provided sales targets, regardless of the systematic plan and set to further follow-up communications between the parties, which were established in the following consequences in case of failure to achieve goals: a letter from Delta ../../ ...., in which it was stated that ... ... and the next letter Beta of ../../ .... where Beta took note of the contents of the previous letter Delta: communications should be considered supplementary to the contract and related provisions (see doc. ... ... products from Delta with the response of first instance).
The Court of Appeals failed to apply the rules laid down in Articles. 1362, subsection 2, 1363 cc and under which, in the identification of the will of the parties must proceed systematic recourse to the criterion and the coordination of the various contract terms, and the search for the will of the parties taking into account the overall conduct of the parties. The Court of MISUSE Ecc.ma Court, albeit in a non-unanimous, held that the criterion of literal interpretation of the will of the parties claimed art. 1362, cc, paragraph 1, is not placed on a level of supremacy from the criterion represented by the conduct of the parties even after the conclusion of the contract mentioned in paragraph 2 of Rule.
The Court of Appeal erred in finding that first case in the wording of the contract was not likely to give rise to doubts being however, the maxim in claris non fit interpretatio questionable expression of a principle, not the subject of a clear authority, having taken into account in the process of interpretation, even in the face of a given literal may look clear, the conduct of the parties after the conclusion of the contract which prove to be capable of clarifying and determining the will of the parties. In this case, there were acts of the trial documents, and the first letters of ../../ .... and ../../ .... . These letters were referred to the contractual provision containing an indication of revenue targets, and they could not be regarded as supplementary to the contract.
The Court of Appeals failed to consider and excluding any relevance of subsequent conduct of the parties and especially the many letters in which Beta was referring to the objectives stated that ... .... It is precisely the point of ../../ .... where it is said that ... ... and the letter of ../../ .... where it was also stated that ... .... In this way, the Court of Appeals disregarded the art. 1362, subsection 2, Code of Civil Procedure In
not consider the conduct of the parties following the conclusion of the contract and the statements referred to in letters exchanged between the parties, the Court has also violated Article. 1363 cc under which the contract provisions are interpreted by each other, so direct examination was negotiating to rebuild will be global.
The Court of Appeals ... ... then disregarded the rules that the parties' intention to seek even more according to standards that may accompany the literal data.

For all those reasons, Delta SpA, represented and as specified in the epigraph,
ASKS
this Ecc.ma Supreme Court or tribunal should:
- dismiss the action brought by Beta and Delta notified on. ./../ .... against sentence no ... ... Given by the Court of Appeals on ../../ ... ... ...., Lodged with the Registrar on ../../ ...., for all the reasons for rejection are unfounded and explained in this document;
- in allowing the appeal in the alternative proposed by Delta, set aside the sentence no ... ... Given by the Court of Appeals on ../../ ... ... ...., Lodged with the Registrar on ../../ .... limited to the chief who has rejected requests for a finding of Beta obligations to purchase minimum quantities of products under contract ... ../../. to issue and under the terms mentioned in this document, and the subsequent application for an order to pay damages;
- in strict subordination, relative to the appeal, MISUSE Ecc.ma Court if it considers unnecessary additional findings of fact, deciding the merits pursuant to art. 384 cpc, accept the above claims made by Delta, which are rewritten here with the Act's definition of the Opinion filed on ../../ .... On appeal:
... ... ... ...

- order Beta SpA recast costs and fees of this proceeding.
With the original of this defense, the copy shall be deposited notified of the action of Beta, and the file of the two previous instances.
Rome, Mr. ... ... ... ...

Special Prosecution:

Unique Funny Wedding Invitation Wording'

ORDER APPLICATION CONVERSION OF RITUAL

... ... ... ...
The Court of Justice, to the dissolution of the reservation made at the hearing ../../ .... gives the following
ORDER
the civil suit included the number of role above
BETWEEN
... ..., represented. ... ... ... ...

E, represented. ... ...

NOTED that action under Article. 702 bis filed on ../../ .... the appellant asked this court ... ...;
that set court appearance of the parties shall be duly constituted by the respondent ... ..., who has questioned the validity demand should be dismissed;
that all the defenses and exceptions made by the parties and do not require a full summary statement, because (state the obvious reasons: the need for complex expert technical assessments, the need for a substantial preliminary hearing, etc. .)
that, therefore, appropriate to order the conversion of the rite and the continuation of the trial with full knowledge in forms of ritual art. 702, paragraph 3, Code of Civil Procedure;
PQM
1) provides for the conversion of the rite and the continuation of proceedings with the ordinary forms of cognition ... ...;
2) fixed the hearing for the obligations of Article. 183 Code of Civil Procedure for the date of ../../ ...., H ... ...;
communicate. Place and date

Judge

Unique Funny Wedding Invitation Wording'

ORDER APPLICATION CONVERSION OF RITUAL

... ... ... ...
The Court of Justice, to the dissolution of the reservation made at the hearing ../../ .... gives the following
ORDER
the civil suit included the number of role above
BETWEEN
... ..., represented. ... ... ... ...

E, represented. ... ...

NOTED that action under Article. 702 bis filed on ../../ .... the appellant asked this court ... ...;
that set court appearance of the parties shall be duly constituted by the respondent ... ..., who has questioned the validity demand should be dismissed;
that all the defenses and exceptions made by the parties and do not require a full summary statement, because (state the obvious reasons: the need for complex expert technical assessments, the need for a substantial preliminary hearing, etc. .)
that, therefore, appropriate to order the conversion of the rite and the continuation of the trial with full knowledge in forms of ritual art. 702, paragraph 3, Code of Civil Procedure;
PQM
1) provides for the conversion of the rite and the continuation of proceedings with the ordinary forms of cognition ... ...;
2) fixed the hearing for the obligations of Article. 183 Code of Civil Procedure for the date of ../../ ...., H ... ...;
communicate. Place and date

Judge

Translate Doujinshiin English

MINUTES OF HEARING OF THE JURY CTU FORMULATION WITH THE TERMS OF THE QUESTION AND AWARD UNDER ART. CPC 195

COURT OF ... ... ... ...
Later today are the attorneys of the parties. It 'also born in the OTC ... ... ... ... ... ... resident, who accepts the appointment and the oath of ritual art. 193 CCP: "I swear well and faithfully discharge the functions entrusted to me for the sole purpose of making known to the court the truth. " The formula
COURT
the following question:
"" The CTU, examined the pleadings and made appropriate investigations after hearing the parties and their CTP, experiment, if deemed appropriate, the attempt at reconciliation: (the following question) "The CTU
fixed for the beginning of the day during his investigation ../../. ..., at ... at ... ... ... ... ... in, street / square ... ... No ... .... The

COURT - CTU grants deadline until ../../ .... for delivery to the parties of the first draft of the expert report;
- shall allow the parties until the end ... ../../. for comment,
- as a deadline for filing the final version of the CTU (in which the CTU will have to make a summary assessment of the Comments attached with the advice) the date of ../../ ....;
- assign to the OTC fund of € ... ..., which places provisionally charged solidarity of the parties;
- the latter term grants of up to two days before the start of surveying operations for the appointment of advisers in part by observing the manner laid down art. Cpc 201;
- acknowledges that part ... ... ... CTP nomination right now ...;
- opens hearing on ../../ ...., for hours ... ... ... ..., a CTU already examined for ... .... THE COURT

CTU (including retirement issues)

Card Reader Driver Vx-539

DEFENCE

COURT OF ... ...
Sec. ... ... Civ. - Dr. Judge. ... ... In the civil lawsuit brought by
:
Alfa, represented. ... ...
- Actress -
AGAINST
Beta, represented. ... ...
- defendant -
appearance and
RESPONSE IN THE INTEREST OF THE DEFENDANT BETA Beta
The company, in the person of the only pro tempore, Mr.. ... ..., Appointed by resolution of the shareholders ... / .. / .... which is attached in acts, duly authorized representative within the meaning of Association, with headquarters in ... ..., (CF & P. \u200b\u200bIVA ... ... ... ...), represented and, under warrant of attorney in the bottom of this Act, by .. ... ... ... ... Of the hole, and elected domicile at the office of the latter ... ...
EXHIBIT
By writ of summons served on ../../ ...., Alfa, a company established in ... ... has Beta defendant before this Tribunal, requesting it to be ascertained and declared, pursuant to Art. 1493 cc, the termination of the contract for the purchase of an industrial kitchen concluded on ../../ .... And that, therefore, should be ordered Beta the return of the consideration paid by Alfa, plus statutory interest and currency appreciation and compensation for all damages suffered by Alfa as a result of the alleged failure of that kitchen. Alfa
outlined in that regard that it had bought the kitchen of the above, the defendant company, the canteen located within your site ... ... and he had agreed with the seller for the payment of a fee of sales amounting to ... ... to be paid in the delivery and in part, to balance, as a result of testing and monitoring development activities to be carried out in contradiction with the parties. Reports
still attacking society that the kitchen was delivered and installed on ../../ .... by technicians of Beta that would confirm the immediate usability and, on that occasion, Alfa has paid to Beta, by bank transfer, the first installment of the price of € ... ... ...
On ../../ . occurred at the headquarters of Alpha, the claim that gave rise to this dispute, and which were claimed by the plaintiff, in addition to having caused the destruction of the dining areas by Alfa, has caused serious damage to a neighboring property owned by Zeta and serious injury to Mr. Tom and Mr. Harry, this same employee of Alfa.
Alfa, therefore, considered that the cause of the accident is due to defects and flaws in the kitchen fitted by Beta, after informing the defendant of its wish to terminate the contract with the same elapsed under Article. 1492 cc, has demanded and claimed by the latter, in addition to the return of the price already paid, compensation for damages suffered and suffered, as described in the technical report on Mr. ../../ ... ... ...., filed by the opposing party sub doc. No ... ...
Beta, as shown above, defense, disputes in fact and in law all the above in the summons and was established in this court asking that the opposing claim are rejected in their entirety for the following. REASONS

First, the contract in question, the parties expressly provided for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of ... ... for all disputes relating to its "interpretation, performance, resolution and / or termination, for any reason occurred (see art. ... ... ... ../../ content in the order given. see doc. Chambers. ... No ....)
It therefore argues at the outset, the jurisdiction of the court in favor of that of the Court of ... ...
the merits, should be immediately clear that Beta, is engaged in commodity production and sale of kitchens, since ... ... in a leading position in the market both nationally and internationally (Doc. No ... ...).
His brand has become synonymous over the years of high quality and reliability.
Beta activity has always been characterized by extreme attention to functionality and safety of products sold, which was evidenced by the fact that Beta was a pioneer, both on the national scene, and in the € ment, provide the appropriate quality certifications ... ... (see doc. nn. ... ...).
no coincidence that Alpha Beta has had with long-standing customer relationships, having been given to the defendant company, not only for the purchase of food the subject of this dispute, but also for the supply of ... ... without having ever had anything to complain as to the operation of the purchased goods. The initiative taken by the actress
court reaches, however, unexpected, since the verifications carried out by technicians of confidence of the parties and the investigations conducted by the Fire Department, in the establishment of Alpha, in order to identify the causes of the accident described in the summons, revealed circumstances which exclude any liability of Beta in relation to the damage alleged by the defendant.
are produced in this regard, the technical report of the engineer. On ... ... ../../ .... (Doc. No ... ...), and the report drawn up by the fire on ../../ .... at the conclusion of all investigations carried out at the left (Doc. No ... ..., that party has failed to produce, having annexed to the minutes of the proceedings only the first intervention of the same Fire Brigade), in which they were highlighted several deficiencies in equipment for the natural gas and electricity which was equipped with a canteen of Alfa. The
these plants, in fact, were non-compliant (security) currently in force and wholly inadequate to the effective functioning of new kitchen supplied by Beta. Circumstances, those who have certainly had a major part in the verification of the claim on which is at issue.
Moreover, the need to provide safe and efficient systems to ensure the proper operation of appliances purchased and safety of the people who have used has been duly represented by the seller to Alpha Beta, and the latter is also confirmed by the engineers at installation of new kitchen. This is so true that Beta, in front of the reluctance of Alpha to collect the above information, has asked for and received in the sale contract would be an exemption from liability of the seller for any damages due to defective and / or irregularities in plant and premises of the acquiring company, with particular reference to those resulting from failure to comply with the law (see doc. ... No ....)
pads above apply, then, to deny the allegations of party foundation.
It also points out that the assumptions made by the actress about the causes of what happened in their establishment is unlikely for the same dynamic of the facts.
Consider that the incident in question caused the destruction of the premises of the canteen located at the site of ... ..., and serious damage to people and property even at a considerable distance from it.
This is for the occurrence of a violent explosion, as also emphasized the Fire Department in their report, is due most probably to a rich gas leak.
Such an occurrence can not be attributed to the exponent, which not only made the installation of the kitchen in full compliance with technical requirements and security measures similar to preside, but has used (as far as the connection of appliances to plumbing, electrical and gas supply natural gas), the assistance of the workers and technicians trust Alfa. The latter, for each installed component, was undertaken the appropriate checks functioned properly, the results of which confirmed the usability of the entire kitchen.
Needless to say, no responsibility can be ascribed to the defendant for the accident in question, the same can not be accused of failure, so just do not see under what conditions the actress claims to terminate the contract of purchase kitchen and the defendant to obtain the return of what has previously been paid by way of price, in addition to compensation for damages.
The defendant, indeed, not only does not have anything to plaintiff, but against it, has a claim far greater amounts of the same claims in these proceedings.
In this regard it is noted that Alpha was the same as to admit that he only paid a portion (equal to € ... ...) of the agreed to purchase the food industry, amounting to € ... .... Consequently, still remaining to be paid to Beta the sum of € ... ... as per Invoice No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Which produces sub doc. No
... ... It should be added that Alpha Beta is indebted to the further amount of € ... ... ... ... relating to previous deliveries, as evidenced by invoices nos. And ... ... ... ... issued by the defendant on ../../ .... and never challenged by the other party (doc. nos. ... ...).
The application of the plaintiff should therefore be rejected, the same actress must be ordered by way of counterclaim, to pay to Beta sums listed above, plus any interest due.
The defendant, then, opposes the admission of testimonial evidence deduced from the party alleging circumstances as general and immaterial to the decision of the case. For the reasons set out
, Beta, as shown above and defense, asking for acceptance of the following
CONCLUSIONS
Like it all'Ill. Mo Court hearing the case, rejected any contrary instance and exception,
First Rite:
decline jurisdiction in favor of the Territorial Court of ... ... for reasons explained in the narrative of this occurrence.
the merits, principally:
A) dismiss any claims made against Alfa Beta, as unfounded in fact and in law, and quantum nell'an;
In a counterclaim:
B) order to Alfa Beta correspond to the sum of € ... ..., of which:
- € ... ... the balance of the fee payable for the purchase of industrial kitchen in dispute, as per Invoice No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Attached acts;
- € ... ... as payment for the supply of ... ..., respectively, performed on ../../ .... ../../ and on ...., as invoices No Of ../../ ... ... .... and No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Attached to instruments;
all over the legal interest by the deadlines specified in the invoices to the actual balance.
In any case:
C) order the plaintiff to pay the costs, the rights and fees due, plus accessories of the law;
By way of investigating
D) accept oral testimony on the following chapter:
1) true that on ../../ .... at the headquarters of Alpha in ... ... participated in the installation of industrial kitchen provided by Mr Beta. ... ..., An electrician, and ... ..., plumber, trustworthy technicians Alfa, by the latter task of ensuring the connection of appliances in the kitchen facilities as water, electricity and supply of natural gas, and that the outcome assembly, the said engineers have tested the appliances in question confirmed that they could be used immediately.
You indicate which texts
- Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ...;
- Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ...;
subject to deduct additional chapters and testimonial evidence to indicate texts in the period to be assigned by the court under art. 183, paragraph 6, No 2, the CPC, which are presented for the award right now;
E) rejected, in addition, each instance of inquiry made by the counterparty for the reasons stated in documents.
F) In the unlikely event of admission of the evidence relied on testimony by the plaintiff in the summons, the defendant contends, as of now, to be admitted in evidence to the contrary made by the defendant on the chapters with the text above.
subject to any further deduction, and further define the meaning of art. 183 cpc, including in relation to defense which will be held by the counterparty in the relevant terms.
Attached:
- a copy of the summons served.
They produce a copy of the following documents:
1) ... ...;
2) ... ...;
(If the value of the counterclaim exceeds the value of the claims of the plaintiff, as stated in the summons, the defendant must make a declaration at the bottom of pop, as in the example below, and take responsibility to integrate the unified contribution paid by the plaintiff.)
In compliance with the provisions of articles when. 9 ff. of presidential decree No. 115/2002 (TU of laws and regulations relating to legal costs), we hereby declare that the Constitution elevates the value of the procedure from € to € ... ... ... ..., resulting in integration of the contribution due to the unified rate of € ... ... ... ...
there
Signature ... ... ... ...

Translate Doujinshiin English

MINUTES OF HEARING OF THE JURY CTU FORMULATION WITH THE TERMS OF THE QUESTION AND AWARD UNDER ART. CPC 195

COURT OF ... ... ... ...
Later today are the attorneys of the parties. It 'also born in the OTC ... ... ... ... ... ... resident, who accepts the appointment and the oath of ritual art. 193 CCP: "I swear well and faithfully discharge the functions entrusted to me for the sole purpose of making known to the court the truth. " The formula
COURT
the following question:
"" The CTU, examined the pleadings and made appropriate investigations after hearing the parties and their CTP, experiment, if deemed appropriate, the attempt at reconciliation: (the following question) "The CTU
fixed for the beginning of the day during his investigation ../../. ..., at ... at ... ... ... ... ... in, street / square ... ... No ... .... The

COURT - CTU grants deadline until ../../ .... for delivery to the parties of the first draft of the expert report;
- shall allow the parties until the end ... ../../. for comment,
- as a deadline for filing the final version of the CTU (in which the CTU will have to make a summary assessment of the Comments attached with the advice) the date of ../../ ....;
- assign to the OTC fund of € ... ..., which places provisionally charged solidarity of the parties;
- the latter term grants of up to two days before the start of surveying operations for the appointment of advisers in part by observing the manner laid down art. Cpc 201;
- acknowledges that part ... ... ... CTP nomination right now ...;
- opens hearing on ../../ ...., for hours ... ... ... ..., a CTU already examined for ... .... THE COURT

CTU (including retirement issues)

Card Reader Driver Vx-539

DEFENCE

COURT OF ... ...
Sec. ... ... Civ. - Dr. Judge. ... ... In the civil lawsuit brought by
:
Alfa, represented. ... ...
- Actress -
AGAINST
Beta, represented. ... ...
- defendant -
appearance and
RESPONSE IN THE INTEREST OF THE DEFENDANT BETA Beta
The company, in the person of the only pro tempore, Mr.. ... ..., Appointed by resolution of the shareholders ... / .. / .... which is attached in acts, duly authorized representative within the meaning of Association, with headquarters in ... ..., (CF & P. \u200b\u200bIVA ... ... ... ...), represented and, under warrant of attorney in the bottom of this Act, by .. ... ... ... ... Of the hole, and elected domicile at the office of the latter ... ...
EXHIBIT
By writ of summons served on ../../ ...., Alfa, a company established in ... ... has Beta defendant before this Tribunal, requesting it to be ascertained and declared, pursuant to Art. 1493 cc, the termination of the contract for the purchase of an industrial kitchen concluded on ../../ .... And that, therefore, should be ordered Beta the return of the consideration paid by Alfa, plus statutory interest and currency appreciation and compensation for all damages suffered by Alfa as a result of the alleged failure of that kitchen. Alfa
outlined in that regard that it had bought the kitchen of the above, the defendant company, the canteen located within your site ... ... and he had agreed with the seller for the payment of a fee of sales amounting to ... ... to be paid in the delivery and in part, to balance, as a result of testing and monitoring development activities to be carried out in contradiction with the parties. Reports
still attacking society that the kitchen was delivered and installed on ../../ .... by technicians of Beta that would confirm the immediate usability and, on that occasion, Alfa has paid to Beta, by bank transfer, the first installment of the price of € ... ... ...
On ../../ . occurred at the headquarters of Alpha, the claim that gave rise to this dispute, and which were claimed by the plaintiff, in addition to having caused the destruction of the dining areas by Alfa, has caused serious damage to a neighboring property owned by Zeta and serious injury to Mr. Tom and Mr. Harry, this same employee of Alfa.
Alfa, therefore, considered that the cause of the accident is due to defects and flaws in the kitchen fitted by Beta, after informing the defendant of its wish to terminate the contract with the same elapsed under Article. 1492 cc, has demanded and claimed by the latter, in addition to the return of the price already paid, compensation for damages suffered and suffered, as described in the technical report on Mr. ../../ ... ... ...., filed by the opposing party sub doc. No ... ...
Beta, as shown above, defense, disputes in fact and in law all the above in the summons and was established in this court asking that the opposing claim are rejected in their entirety for the following. REASONS

First, the contract in question, the parties expressly provided for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of ... ... for all disputes relating to its "interpretation, performance, resolution and / or termination, for any reason occurred (see art. ... ... ... ../../ content in the order given. see doc. Chambers. ... No ....)
It therefore argues at the outset, the jurisdiction of the court in favor of that of the Court of ... ...
the merits, should be immediately clear that Beta, is engaged in commodity production and sale of kitchens, since ... ... in a leading position in the market both nationally and internationally (Doc. No ... ...).
His brand has become synonymous over the years of high quality and reliability.
Beta activity has always been characterized by extreme attention to functionality and safety of products sold, which was evidenced by the fact that Beta was a pioneer, both on the national scene, and in the € ment, provide the appropriate quality certifications ... ... (see doc. nn. ... ...).
no coincidence that Alpha Beta has had with long-standing customer relationships, having been given to the defendant company, not only for the purchase of food the subject of this dispute, but also for the supply of ... ... without having ever had anything to complain as to the operation of the purchased goods. The initiative taken by the actress
court reaches, however, unexpected, since the verifications carried out by technicians of confidence of the parties and the investigations conducted by the Fire Department, in the establishment of Alpha, in order to identify the causes of the accident described in the summons, revealed circumstances which exclude any liability of Beta in relation to the damage alleged by the defendant.
are produced in this regard, the technical report of the engineer. On ... ... ../../ .... (Doc. No ... ...), and the report drawn up by the fire on ../../ .... at the conclusion of all investigations carried out at the left (Doc. No ... ..., that party has failed to produce, having annexed to the minutes of the proceedings only the first intervention of the same Fire Brigade), in which they were highlighted several deficiencies in equipment for the natural gas and electricity which was equipped with a canteen of Alfa. The
these plants, in fact, were non-compliant (security) currently in force and wholly inadequate to the effective functioning of new kitchen supplied by Beta. Circumstances, those who have certainly had a major part in the verification of the claim on which is at issue.
Moreover, the need to provide safe and efficient systems to ensure the proper operation of appliances purchased and safety of the people who have used has been duly represented by the seller to Alpha Beta, and the latter is also confirmed by the engineers at installation of new kitchen. This is so true that Beta, in front of the reluctance of Alpha to collect the above information, has asked for and received in the sale contract would be an exemption from liability of the seller for any damages due to defective and / or irregularities in plant and premises of the acquiring company, with particular reference to those resulting from failure to comply with the law (see doc. ... No ....)
pads above apply, then, to deny the allegations of party foundation.
It also points out that the assumptions made by the actress about the causes of what happened in their establishment is unlikely for the same dynamic of the facts.
Consider that the incident in question caused the destruction of the premises of the canteen located at the site of ... ..., and serious damage to people and property even at a considerable distance from it.
This is for the occurrence of a violent explosion, as also emphasized the Fire Department in their report, is due most probably to a rich gas leak.
Such an occurrence can not be attributed to the exponent, which not only made the installation of the kitchen in full compliance with technical requirements and security measures similar to preside, but has used (as far as the connection of appliances to plumbing, electrical and gas supply natural gas), the assistance of the workers and technicians trust Alfa. The latter, for each installed component, was undertaken the appropriate checks functioned properly, the results of which confirmed the usability of the entire kitchen.
Needless to say, no responsibility can be ascribed to the defendant for the accident in question, the same can not be accused of failure, so just do not see under what conditions the actress claims to terminate the contract of purchase kitchen and the defendant to obtain the return of what has previously been paid by way of price, in addition to compensation for damages.
The defendant, indeed, not only does not have anything to plaintiff, but against it, has a claim far greater amounts of the same claims in these proceedings.
In this regard it is noted that Alpha was the same as to admit that he only paid a portion (equal to € ... ...) of the agreed to purchase the food industry, amounting to € ... .... Consequently, still remaining to be paid to Beta the sum of € ... ... as per Invoice No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Which produces sub doc. No
... ... It should be added that Alpha Beta is indebted to the further amount of € ... ... ... ... relating to previous deliveries, as evidenced by invoices nos. And ... ... ... ... issued by the defendant on ../../ .... and never challenged by the other party (doc. nos. ... ...).
The application of the plaintiff should therefore be rejected, the same actress must be ordered by way of counterclaim, to pay to Beta sums listed above, plus any interest due.
The defendant, then, opposes the admission of testimonial evidence deduced from the party alleging circumstances as general and immaterial to the decision of the case. For the reasons set out
, Beta, as shown above and defense, asking for acceptance of the following
CONCLUSIONS
Like it all'Ill. Mo Court hearing the case, rejected any contrary instance and exception,
First Rite:
decline jurisdiction in favor of the Territorial Court of ... ... for reasons explained in the narrative of this occurrence.
the merits, principally:
A) dismiss any claims made against Alfa Beta, as unfounded in fact and in law, and quantum nell'an;
In a counterclaim:
B) order to Alfa Beta correspond to the sum of € ... ..., of which:
- € ... ... the balance of the fee payable for the purchase of industrial kitchen in dispute, as per Invoice No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Attached acts;
- € ... ... as payment for the supply of ... ..., respectively, performed on ../../ .... ../../ and on ...., as invoices No Of ../../ ... ... .... and No Of ../../ ... ... ...., Attached to instruments;
all over the legal interest by the deadlines specified in the invoices to the actual balance.
In any case:
C) order the plaintiff to pay the costs, the rights and fees due, plus accessories of the law;
By way of investigating
D) accept oral testimony on the following chapter:
1) true that on ../../ .... at the headquarters of Alpha in ... ... participated in the installation of industrial kitchen provided by Mr Beta. ... ..., An electrician, and ... ..., plumber, trustworthy technicians Alfa, by the latter task of ensuring the connection of appliances in the kitchen facilities as water, electricity and supply of natural gas, and that the outcome assembly, the said engineers have tested the appliances in question confirmed that they could be used immediately.
You indicate which texts
- Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ...;
- Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ...;
subject to deduct additional chapters and testimonial evidence to indicate texts in the period to be assigned by the court under art. 183, paragraph 6, No 2, the CPC, which are presented for the award right now;
E) rejected, in addition, each instance of inquiry made by the counterparty for the reasons stated in documents.
F) In the unlikely event of admission of the evidence relied on testimony by the plaintiff in the summons, the defendant contends, as of now, to be admitted in evidence to the contrary made by the defendant on the chapters with the text above.
subject to any further deduction, and further define the meaning of art. 183 cpc, including in relation to defense which will be held by the counterparty in the relevant terms.
Attached:
- a copy of the summons served.
They produce a copy of the following documents:
1) ... ...;
2) ... ...;
(If the value of the counterclaim exceeds the value of the claims of the plaintiff, as stated in the summons, the defendant must make a declaration at the bottom of pop, as in the example below, and take responsibility to integrate the unified contribution paid by the plaintiff.)
In compliance with the provisions of articles when. 9 ff. of presidential decree No. 115/2002 (TU of laws and regulations relating to legal costs), we hereby declare that the Constitution elevates the value of the procedure from € to € ... ... ... ..., resulting in integration of the contribution due to the unified rate of € ... ... ... ...
there
Signature ... ... ... ...

Cleaninghornsilver Coins

declaration of revocation from the assumption of the text does

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING At the hearing on
../../ .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant.
the witness fails to appear for X whose enforcement was scheduled today's hearing. Mr.
. ... ..., Is invited to file the notice of summons to the witness, but say they have done to intimacy. THE GI

particular act, says the party has lapsed from the assumption of witness evidence and refers to the clarification of the conclusions of the hearing ../../ ....,
hours ... ... ... ... ... ... there
Signature Judge ... ...

Things Remebered Pink Remote

ORDER THAT PROVIDES THE ACCOMPANYING forcible NOT APPEAR WITNESS FOR TWO HEARINGS

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING ... ...

../../ of hearing .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant. Mr.
. Act of deposit ... ... ... ... the witness summons, properly served.
hours ... ... Until the witness does not appear, and it is recognized that communication is not reached on any such impediment. THE GI

acknowledged;
noted that it is spent more than an hour from the one indicated by the appearance of the witness, and that it did not appear;
expected that the witness had not already appeared at the previous hearing on ../../. ... despite the regularity of the notification intimacy, and this was the same already imposed a fine of € ... ...;
read the provisions of art. Cpc 255;
PQM
refer the case, again for the examination of the witness at the hearing ../../ ....;
have that audience to the accompaniment enforced by the Police of ... heads the ... Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ... No ... ...;
condemns Mr heads. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ... No ... ... And the payment of the exchequer, the additional penalty of € ... ... and expenses caused by the no-show for € ... ...;
sent to the Registrar to communicate to the Carabinieri and the notification of this decision to 'question.
... ... ... ... there
Signature of Judge

... ... ... ...

Cleaninghornsilver Coins

declaration of revocation from the assumption of the text does

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING At the hearing on
../../ .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant.
the witness fails to appear for X whose enforcement was scheduled today's hearing. Mr.
. ... ..., Is invited to file the notice of summons to the witness, but say they have done to intimacy. THE GI

particular act, says the party has lapsed from the assumption of witness evidence and refers to the clarification of the conclusions of the hearing ../../ ....,
hours ... ... ... ... ... ... there
Signature Judge ... ...

Things Remebered Pink Remote

ORDER THAT PROVIDES THE ACCOMPANYING forcible NOT APPEAR WITNESS FOR TWO HEARINGS

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING ... ...

../../ of hearing .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant. Mr.
. Act of deposit ... ... ... ... the witness summons, properly served.
hours ... ... Until the witness does not appear, and it is recognized that communication is not reached on any such impediment. THE GI

acknowledged;
noted that it is spent more than an hour from the one indicated by the appearance of the witness, and that it did not appear;
expected that the witness had not already appeared at the previous hearing on ../../. ... despite the regularity of the notification intimacy, and this was the same already imposed a fine of € ... ...;
read the provisions of art. Cpc 255;
PQM
refer the case, again for the examination of the witness at the hearing ../../ ....;
have that audience to the accompaniment enforced by the Police of ... heads the ... Mr. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ... No ... ...;
condemns Mr heads. ... ..., Residing at ... ... on ... ... No ... ... And the payment of the exchequer, the additional penalty of € ... ... and expenses caused by the no-show for € ... ...;
sent to the Registrar to communicate to the Carabinieri and the notification of this decision to 'question.
... ... ... ... there
Signature of Judge

... ... ... ...

Engagement Invitation Wording

NOTICE ORDER IMPOSING PENALTY FOR PAYMENT OF THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF NON-APPLICATION HEAD

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING ... ...

At the hearing on ../../ .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant. Mr.
. Act of deposit ... ... ... ... the witness summons, properly served.
hours ... ... Until the witness does not appear, and it is recognized that communication is not reached on any such impediment. THE GI

acknowledged;
found that was spent over an hour from that stated for the appearance of the witness, and that it did not appear;
refer the case, again for the examination of the witness at the hearing ../../ of ....;
condemns Mr heads. ... ... resident in ... ... on ... ... No ... ... And the payment of the exchequer, the financial penalty of € ... ... and expenses caused by the no-show for € ... ...
sent to the Registry for the notification of this decision to the person.
... ... ... ... there
judge's signature ... ...

Engagement Invitation Wording

NOTICE ORDER IMPOSING PENALTY FOR PAYMENT OF THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF NON-APPLICATION HEAD

COURT OF MINUTES OF HEARING ... ...

At the hearing on ../../ .... are the lawyer. ... ... For the actor and Att. ... ... For the defendant. Mr.
. Act of deposit ... ... ... ... the witness summons, properly served.
hours ... ... Until the witness does not appear, and it is recognized that communication is not reached on any such impediment. THE GI

acknowledged;
found that was spent over an hour from that stated for the appearance of the witness, and that it did not appear;
refer the case, again for the examination of the witness at the hearing ../../ of ....;
condemns Mr heads. ... ... resident in ... ... on ... ... No ... ... And the payment of the exchequer, the financial penalty of € ... ... and expenses caused by the no-show for € ... ...
sent to the Registry for the notification of this decision to the person.
... ... ... ... there
judge's signature ... ...

Kasneb Results Cpa 2010

for relief ART. 153, paragraph 2, CPC

COURT OF ... ... In the civil suit RG
No ... ... Sponsored by: Alfa
, represented. ... ...
- Actress -
AGAINST
Beta, represented. ... ...
- defendant -
AND AGAINST OF
range, represented. ... ...
- third call -
AND
Epsilon LTD, represented. ... ...
- third call -
APPLICATION UNDER ART. 153, paragraph 2, in the interest of CPC

ALFA ALFA, represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ... Right delegation on the sidelines of the response filed on ../../ .... and address for service at the office of the same in ... ...
WHEREAS
- following the joint request of the parties pursuant to Art. 295 cpc, sitting on ../../ .... has been ordered to suspend the trial for three months without fixing a hearing for the continuation of the trial;
- with action on ... .... Alfa has requested the hearing fixed for the continuation of the trial;
- ../../ at the hearing. ..., Being fixed, the defendant pleaded the delay in filing the appeal, as happened over a period of ten days before the expiry of the suspension;
- consequently, the judge, by order of context, said the lateness of the takeover and the subsequent termination of the proceedings pursuant to Art. Cpc 307;
- failure to comply with the deadline for reinstatement was due to the serious health condition of the undersigned counsel of Alpha, as evidenced by the following documents (see ... ....).
That said,
Alfa, as above represented and defended as the acts
ASKS
Ill. Mo court, established that the conditions for the applicability of the case art. CCP 153 should, after any necessary measure and reject,
1) revoke the order on ../../ .... with which he declared the proceedings RG ... ... extinct;
2) provide for the referral in terms of Alpha and the effect declared admissible the application for resumption of proceedings filed on ../../ ....;
3) new hearing set for the continuation of the proceedings.
... ... ... ... there
Attorney ... ...

Kasneb Results Cpa 2010

for relief ART. 153, paragraph 2, CPC

COURT OF ... ... In the civil suit RG
No ... ... Sponsored by: Alfa
, represented. ... ...
- Actress -
AGAINST
Beta, represented. ... ...
- defendant -
AND AGAINST OF
range, represented. ... ...
- third call -
AND
Epsilon LTD, represented. ... ...
- third call -
APPLICATION UNDER ART. 153, paragraph 2, in the interest of CPC

ALFA ALFA, represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ... Right delegation on the sidelines of the response filed on ../../ .... and address for service at the office of the same in ... ...
WHEREAS
- following the joint request of the parties pursuant to Art. 295 cpc, sitting on ../../ .... has been ordered to suspend the trial for three months without fixing a hearing for the continuation of the trial;
- with action on ... .... Alfa has requested the hearing fixed for the continuation of the trial;
- ../../ at the hearing. ..., Being fixed, the defendant pleaded the delay in filing the appeal, as happened over a period of ten days before the expiry of the suspension;
- consequently, the judge, by order of context, said the lateness of the takeover and the subsequent termination of the proceedings pursuant to Art. Cpc 307;
- failure to comply with the deadline for reinstatement was due to the serious health condition of the undersigned counsel of Alpha, as evidenced by the following documents (see ... ....).
That said,
Alfa, as above represented and defended as the acts
ASKS
Ill. Mo court, established that the conditions for the applicability of the case art. CCP 153 should, after any necessary measure and reject,
1) revoke the order on ../../ .... with which he declared the proceedings RG ... ... extinct;
2) provide for the referral in terms of Alpha and the effect declared admissible the application for resumption of proceedings filed on ../../ ....;
3) new hearing set for the continuation of the proceedings.
... ... ... ... there
Attorney ... ...

Pokemo Crystal Jar For Mobile

COURT OF ... ...
(omitted)
STATEMENT
detected in that:
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
Considered in law:
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
PQM
(omitted)

Tail Bone Lump Blister

ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT OF THE INQUIRY IN TERMS OF TYPE

COURT OF ... ... The GI

read the application pursuant to Art. 153 cpc ... ... proposed by the civil suit pending between RG ... ... ... ... (with the lawyer. ... ...) ... ... And (with the lawyer. ... ...);
detected:
- on hearing that. ./../ .... Today's party time was forfeited (give specific decline in which the party is committed);
- which, with subsequent action on ../../ .... ... ... asked to be put in the ground that the failure of the first term was due to (indicate the reasons for refusal are not attributable, for example disease that struck the only legal party);
- that in support of the application, the applicant has produced documentation showing the constituent situation because it is not responsible and has articulated the test for texts as to the existence of the impediment;
- which set the hearing for discussion of the application, and granted the defendant until the end ... ../../. for the articulation of any evidence to the contrary, it was established, calling for rejecting the application and in turn articulating oral tests;
(if you believe that the preliminary hearing is unnecessary)
- considered in the light of mere documentation offer, which the party has already provided suitable proof of the cause not attributable to the impediment that has prevented compliance with the deadline of the case;
PQM
seen the art. Cpc 153;
have the referral in terms of ... ... and the effect declared eligible (insert the defense or exception of the case already made out of time and deemed timely as a result of the referral or, if the party has not played defense on which had lapsed) assigns to the new term until ../../ ....
for ... ... ... ... ... ... there
Signature of court ... ...

(or: if you think you bring preliminary hearing on this point)
- considered that the alleged facts are credible and make the appropriate oral hearing of evidence offered by the parties;
PQM
seen the art. Cpc 153;
1) allows the test to verify the actual text on the ground and innocent as to the chaps. ... ...;
2) admits part ... ... the evidence to the contrary with the assigned readings;
3) fixed for the hearing of evidence ../../ ...., H ... ..., reserving the outcome of rule on the request for relief.
... ... ... ... there
judge's signature ... ...

Pokemo Crystal Jar For Mobile

COURT OF ... ...
(omitted)
STATEMENT
detected in that:
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
Considered in law:
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
- ... ...;
PQM
(omitted)

Tail Bone Lump Blister

ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT OF THE INQUIRY IN TERMS OF TYPE

COURT OF ... ... The GI

read the application pursuant to Art. 153 cpc ... ... proposed by the civil suit pending between RG ... ... ... ... (with the lawyer. ... ...) ... ... And (with the lawyer. ... ...);
detected:
- on hearing that. ./../ .... Today's party time was forfeited (give specific decline in which the party is committed);
- which, with subsequent action on ../../ .... ... ... asked to be put in the ground that the failure of the first term was due to (indicate the reasons for refusal are not attributable, for example disease that struck the only legal party);
- that in support of the application, the applicant has produced documentation showing the constituent situation because it is not responsible and has articulated the test for texts as to the existence of the impediment;
- which set the hearing for discussion of the application, and granted the defendant until the end ... ../../. for the articulation of any evidence to the contrary, it was established, calling for rejecting the application and in turn articulating oral tests;
(if you believe that the preliminary hearing is unnecessary)
- considered in the light of mere documentation offer, which the party has already provided suitable proof of the cause not attributable to the impediment that has prevented compliance with the deadline of the case;
PQM
seen the art. Cpc 153;
have the referral in terms of ... ... and the effect declared eligible (insert the defense or exception of the case already made out of time and deemed timely as a result of the referral or, if the party has not played defense on which had lapsed) assigns to the new term until ../../ ....
for ... ... ... ... ... ... there
Signature of court ... ...

(or: if you think you bring preliminary hearing on this point)
- considered that the alleged facts are credible and make the appropriate oral hearing of evidence offered by the parties;
PQM
seen the art. Cpc 153;
1) allows the test to verify the actual text on the ground and innocent as to the chaps. ... ...;
2) admits part ... ... the evidence to the contrary with the assigned readings;
3) fixed for the hearing of evidence ../../ ...., H ... ..., reserving the outcome of rule on the request for relief.
... ... ... ... there
judge's signature ... ...

What Is Cervical Mucus Like Just Before Period

ORDER OF ALLOCATION OF TIME TO DEDUCT FOR OFFICE WITH QUESTIONS FOUND ON THE ROLE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT

COURT OF ... ...
met in closed session and composed Magistrates:
1) dr. ... ... President
2) dr. ... ... Judge
3) dr. ... ... Judge (rel.) gives the following


Order in Case proposed by RG ... ... ... ..., represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ... ... ... Against, represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ...;
read the papers and documents of the case;
detected:
(short fiction in fact);
expected that the parties have proceeded to state the conclusions of the hearing ../../. ..., with the assignment of the time- . 190 CPC and referral of the dispute to the Board for decision;
is considered conclusive for the purpose of resolving the dispute, the inherent profile (what is the matter of the case or on motion detected, for example, timely opposition to a decree injunctive relief or cancellation of the contract concluded before the courts);
noted that the profile has not been addressed by the parties during the proceedings and was not raised in accordance with art. 183, paragraph 4, Code of Civil Procedure;
read the provisions of art. 101, paragraph 2, Code of Civil

PQM - provides for the referral of the dispute on the role;
- shall allow the parties until the end of forty days of notification of this order, for filing at the Court of memories containing observations on the profile of ... ...;
- fixed the hearing before the GI dr. ... ... To the date of ../../. ..., At ... ... for further discussion and possibly clarification of the new findings;
- send to the Registrar to communicate this decision to the parties.
... ... ... ... there
Signature of President ... ...

To Build A Home - The Cinematic Orchestrasheet

HEAD OF GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT DEVICE CONTAINING THE ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF DECISION

PQM
1) ... ...
2) order a part of ... ... that within the ../../ .... - A sum in hand, in case of failure to meet the deadline, ../../ .... of conducting its own right of recovery for publication by the resulting costs - to the publication of an extract of this measure, consisting of the epigraph and from the device, by insertion of legal notices on the page of the newspaper ... ... with the normal double characters;
3) ... ...
Place and date Signature

What Is Cervical Mucus Like Just Before Period

ORDER OF ALLOCATION OF TIME TO DEDUCT FOR OFFICE WITH QUESTIONS FOUND ON THE ROLE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT

COURT OF ... ...
met in closed session and composed Magistrates:
1) dr. ... ... President
2) dr. ... ... Judge
3) dr. ... ... Judge (rel.) gives the following


Order in Case proposed by RG ... ... ... ..., represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ... ... ... Against, represented and defended by the lawyer. ... ...;
read the papers and documents of the case;
detected:
(short fiction in fact);
expected that the parties have proceeded to state the conclusions of the hearing ../../. ..., with the assignment of the time- . 190 CPC and referral of the dispute to the Board for decision;
is considered conclusive for the purpose of resolving the dispute, the inherent profile (what is the matter of the case or on motion detected, for example, timely opposition to a decree injunctive relief or cancellation of the contract concluded before the courts);
noted that the profile has not been addressed by the parties during the proceedings and was not raised in accordance with art. 183, paragraph 4, Code of Civil Procedure;
read the provisions of art. 101, paragraph 2, Code of Civil

PQM - provides for the referral of the dispute on the role;
- shall allow the parties until the end of forty days of notification of this order, for filing at the Court of memories containing observations on the profile of ... ...;
- fixed the hearing before the GI dr. ... ... To the date of ../../. ..., At ... ... for further discussion and possibly clarification of the new findings;
- send to the Registrar to communicate this decision to the parties.
... ... ... ... there
Signature of President ... ...

To Build A Home - The Cinematic Orchestrasheet

HEAD OF GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT DEVICE CONTAINING THE ORDER OF PUBLICATION OF DECISION

PQM
1) ... ...
2) order a part of ... ... that within the ../../ .... - A sum in hand, in case of failure to meet the deadline, ../../ .... of conducting its own right of recovery for publication by the resulting costs - to the publication of an extract of this measure, consisting of the epigraph and from the device, by insertion of legal notices on the page of the newspaper ... ... with the normal double characters;
3) ... ...
Place and date Signature

Nadine Jansenfittniss

SHEET STATEMENT OF CONCLUSIONS

COURT OF ... ...
(Section No. ... ... - Dr. investigating judge. ... ... - No ... ... RG)
SHEET STATEMENT OF CONCLUSIONS
interests of Alfa, represented. ... ... ... ...
the hole-actress-
AGAINST
Beta, represented. Forum ... ... ... ...
-of-defendant and against

Delta, represented. ... ... ... ...
the hole-called third-
The company Alfa, as represented in defense and proceedings, insisting on the acceptance of the following
CONCLUSIONS
Like it all'Ill. mo Court hearing the case, rejected any claim to the contrary, and except for instance, the substance primarily

determine and enforce the resolution, pursuant to and for the purposes of art. 1492 cc, the contract between the parties for the sale of industrial kitchen on ../../ .... and consequently ordered to return to Alpha Beta, pursuant to art. 1493 cc, the amount paid, € ... ..., as well as statutory interest and currency appreciation due to the balance;
Order Beta, along with Delta, the latter by way of non-contractual liability, compensation for all damages suffered by Alfa itself, as put forward in the documents previously deposited and quantified in the sum of € ... ..., or in what will be liquidated by the Court, plus statutory interest and currency appreciation calculated from the date of individual payments made by an Alfa, and in any case, the date of the claim;
in alternative
offset any sum due as determined by Alfa as the balance of the price of industrial kitchen with the amounts to be paid as compensation for damages against the defendant Beta,

order in any case, within the meaning of ' art. 120, paragraph 1, Code of Civil Procedure, to proceed to Beta by the end of ../../ .... - Right in the head with the actress, in the event of non-compliance of that period, to proceed directly with a right of recovery of its costs - the publication of an extract of the award, consisting of the epigraph and the device, by insertion of legal notices on the page of the newspaper ... ... with the normal double characters;
order the defendant and the third call for the reimbursement of expenses, fees and charges in the case, as well as accessories with the law as a trial

admit oral testimony on the following chapter:
1) "True that on .. / .. / .... at the premises of ... ..., the outcome of the assembly and commissioning of industrial kitchen, Mr. ... ..., Head Technical Beta, has confirmed that pending proceeding with the verification of control, the kitchen could be used. " We show how texts
Mr. ... ..., Residing at Alfa, and Mr. ... ... ... ... Domiciled at

Nadine Jansenfittniss

SHEET STATEMENT OF CONCLUSIONS

COURT OF ... ...
(Section No. ... ... - Dr. investigating judge. ... ... - No ... ... RG)
SHEET STATEMENT OF CONCLUSIONS
interests of Alfa, represented. ... ... ... ...
the hole-actress-
AGAINST
Beta, represented. Forum ... ... ... ...
-of-defendant and against

Delta, represented. ... ... ... ...
the hole-called third-
The company Alfa, as represented in defense and proceedings, insisting on the acceptance of the following
CONCLUSIONS
Like it all'Ill. mo Court hearing the case, rejected any claim to the contrary, and except for instance, the substance primarily

determine and enforce the resolution, pursuant to and for the purposes of art. 1492 cc, the contract between the parties for the sale of industrial kitchen on ../../ .... and consequently ordered to return to Alpha Beta, pursuant to art. 1493 cc, the amount paid, € ... ..., as well as statutory interest and currency appreciation due to the balance;
Order Beta, along with Delta, the latter by way of non-contractual liability, compensation for all damages suffered by Alfa itself, as put forward in the documents previously deposited and quantified in the sum of € ... ..., or in what will be liquidated by the Court, plus statutory interest and currency appreciation calculated from the date of individual payments made by an Alfa, and in any case, the date of the claim;
in alternative
offset any sum due as determined by Alfa as the balance of the price of industrial kitchen with the amounts to be paid as compensation for damages against the defendant Beta,

order in any case, within the meaning of ' art. 120, paragraph 1, Code of Civil Procedure, to proceed to Beta by the end of ../../ .... - Right in the head with the actress, in the event of non-compliance of that period, to proceed directly with a right of recovery of its costs - the publication of an extract of the award, consisting of the epigraph and the device, by insertion of legal notices on the page of the newspaper ... ... with the normal double characters;
order the defendant and the third call for the reimbursement of expenses, fees and charges in the case, as well as accessories with the law as a trial

admit oral testimony on the following chapter:
1) "True that on .. / .. / .... at the premises of ... ..., the outcome of the assembly and commissioning of industrial kitchen, Mr. ... ..., Head Technical Beta, has confirmed that pending proceeding with the verification of control, the kitchen could be used. " We show how texts
Mr. ... ..., Residing at Alfa, and Mr. ... ... ... ... Domiciled at